|
Prof. Kazuto YASUDA and Mami Hiraoka, Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, the Graduate School of Nutrition Sciences |
| [Abstract]
Recently, physical activity in the daily lives of Japanese people has changed considerably and the number of low level of physically active people is on the rise. In a survey of female college students, the average energy intake showed a value similar to the recommended energy allowance for people whose physical activity is classified as level I (low). Although most of the subjects ingested sufficient vitamin B1 in proportion to their energy intake due to limited food intake, approximately 20% did not meet the recommended allowance in their vitamin B1 intake. In the case of vitamin A, for which the allowance is determined independently of energy intake, approximately 50% did not meet the allowance. However, few of the subjects showed decreased levels of these vitamins in the blood. It was also suggested that increased folate intake was necessary. |
|
According to the National Survey on Nutrition conducted by the Ministry
of Health and Welfare, Japanese people have consistently met the recommended
allowance in their intake of vitamin A, B1, B2 and C since 1975. However,
the results shown were for an average Japanese; there must be individuals
who fail to meet the recommended allowance. This raises this question:
what percent of Japanese people actually fail to meet the allowance? Most
people do not eat ideal meals meeting the allowances of various vitamins,
taking into account the loss of vitamins in the cooking process. What,
then, is the influence of daily variation in vitamin intake? And what are
the conditions concerning the intake of other vitamins, those not mentioned
above? With respect to these points, we investigated the vitamin intake
of young females who are likely to bear and raise children in the near
future.
The subjects were 193 female college students in the Faculty of Nutrition Sciences aged 21 to 22, with no abnormal results in routine biochemical blood tests and who do not take vitamin pills. Based on a survey of their meals conducted for three consecutive days, the average intakes of vitamin A, B1, B2, B6, niacin, vitamin B12, folate, and vitamin C and E were calculated, and the proportion of subjects who met the recommended allowance was determined for each of the vitamins. For vitamins for which the allowances are not set in the Fifth-Revised Recommended Dietary Allowances in Japan, the U. S. 10th Revision of the Recommended Dietary Allowances (USRDA) were applied. Blood vitamin levels were measured on the day following the 3-day survey to examine the relation to vitamin intake. Physically, the subjects were 158.5}5.1 cm in height, 52.4}6.1 kg in weight, and 20.8}2.1 in BMI, which was similar to the average values in 1996. In order to collect data on vitamin intake concerning individual and daily variation, the subjects were given no specific menu but were directed to maintain their usual eating habits during the survey. The subjects were students in a training course in nutriology and were directed to measure and record their meals as precisely as possible, with the understanding that their records would be graded as an assignment in the course. The survey period was determined through a preliminary survey, which confirmed that a minimum of three days was necessary before the coefficients of variation in vitamin intake dropped to an appropriate level and that the values rose again after a prolonged period. In the healthy female college students surveyed, vitamin B1 intake was 0.91}0.26 mg/day (the average of the 3 days}S.D.), the coefficient of variability (CV), an indicator of differences between individuals, was 28.6% (n=192), and the number of subjects who met the recommended allowance was 151 (78.6%)(Fig. 1). Assuming that 30% of vitamin B1 is lost in the cooking process, as is stated in the Standards for Enforcement of the School Lunch Law (Notification No.16 of the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, 1986), the net vitamin B1 intake was 0.64}0.18 mg/day, in which case the number of subjects who met the recommended allowance decreases to 34.4%. However, since the energy intake of the subjects was 1,568}312 kcal, 92.3% of the subjects met the energy-based vitamin B1 allowance of 0.40 mg/1,000 kcal, on which the recommended daily allowance of the vitamin was based. This means that most of the subjects presumably had a sufficient vitamin B1 intake in proportion to their energy intake. The total vitamin B1 level in the blood of the subjects was 55.1}12.2 ng/mL, with only 2 subjects (1.0%) showing levels below the lower limit of the standard interval of 35|76 (54.6}10.1) ng/mL. It can be inferred from these results that while 21.4% of the subjects failed to meet the recommended vitamin B1 allowance specific to their sex, age, and physical activity, only a few subjects showed low vitamin B1 levels in the blood, i.e. marginal vitamin B1 deficiency, due to the fact that 20% of the allowance is actually an extra amount in consideration of individual variations in demand and that the subjects' demand for the vitamin was small because of their relatively low energy intake and physical inactiveness. The vitamin B2 intake of the subjects determined in a similar manner was 1.20}0.31 mg/day (CV=25.8%, n=189) and 72.0% of the subjects met the recommended allowance. If one assumes that 25% of vitamin B2 is lost in the cooking process, net vitamin B2 intake decreases to 0.90}0.23 mg/day, in which case the number of subjects who met the allowance decreased to 30.2% However, 90.8% of the subjects met the energy-based vitamin B2 allowance of 0.55 mg/1,000 kcal. The total vitamin B2 level in the blood of the subjects was 85.9}17.1 ng/mL, with only 5 subjects (2.7%) showing levels below the lower limit of the standard interval of 58|110 (84.7}11.6) ng/mL. It can be inferred from these results that while 28.0% of the subjects failed to meet the vitamin B2 allowance, only a few showed marginal vitamin B2 deficiency, due to their low energy intake and physical inactiveness, as was inferred in the case of vitamin B1. As for niacin intake, the niacin equivalent intake including the portion converted from tryptophan was 24.0}5.9 mg/day (CV=24.6, n=189), in which 12.6}3.6 mg/day was directly ingested in the form of niacin, while 11.4}2.8 mg/day was ingested in the form of tryptophan, resulting in a ratio of 52.2 : 47.8%. The energy-based niacin equivalent intake of the subjects was 15.3 mg/1,000 kcal/day, without a single subject showing a level below the recommended allowance of 6.6 mg/1,000 kcal. The total niacin level in the blood measured by HPLC was 487.0}119.5 Κg/dL (n=189), without a single subject showing a level below the standard interval of 285|710 (487.2}97.5) Κg/dL (n=189), which means there was no subject with subclinical niacin deficiency. In addition, a correlation was found between the niacin equivalent and the energy intake (r=0.670, p < 0.0001). The vitamin B6 intake of the subjects was 1.35}0.53 mg/day (CV=39.3%, n=185). Since the recommended vitamin B6 allowance is not set in the Fifth-Revised Recommended Dietary Allowances in Japan, fundamental values set in the USRDA were partially applied. The protein-based vitamin B6 intake of the subjects was 0.023}0.010 mg/g protein. Setting a limit of 0.016 mg/g protein, 161 subjects (87.0%) met the recommended allowance. For the group of subjects as a whole, a correlation was found between the protein intake and vitamin B6 intake (r=0.393, p < 0.0001), as well as between the niacin equivalent intake and vitamin B6 intake (r=0.439, p < 0.0001). The total vitamin B6 level in the blood serum measured by HPLC was 11.4}7.7 ng/mL (n=185), with 6 subjects (3.2%) showing levels below the standard interval of 4.0|17.0 (9.1}2.7) ng/mL. Folate is not covered by the Fourth-Revised Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan, and although it is covered by the Fifth-Revised Tables, only a new food section has been published of the fifth revision. Therefore, Bowes & Church's Food Values of Portions Commonly Used 16th Ed., developed in the U. S., was used for calculation. The folate intake of the subjects was 187.3}73.3 Κg/day (CV=39.1%, n=157), with 70 subjects (44.6%) meeting the U. S. recommended allowance (180 ?g/day) (Fig. 2). The folate level in the blood serum was 8.05}2.49 ng/mL, with 10 subjects (6.4%) showing levels below the lower limit of the standard interval of 4.8|12.0 (8.3}1.8) ng/mL. The vitamin B12 intake of the subjects was 4.88}3.55 Κg/day (CV=72.7%, n=162), with 137 subjects (84.6%) meeting the U. S. recommended allowance (2.0 Κg/day). The vitamin B12 level in the blood serum was 615.1}215.1 pg/mL, with one subject (0.62%) showing a level below the lower limit of the standard interval of 260|1,050 (589}170) pg/mL. The vitamin C intake of the subjects was 119.8}79.5 mg/day (CV=66.4, n=299), with 265 subjects (88.6%) meeting the allowance set in the Fifth-Revised RDA. The total vitamin C level in the blood serum was 1.25}0.26 mg/dL, with 6 subjects (2.0%) showing levels below the lower limit of the standard interval. As for the intake of fat soluble vitamins, the vitamin A intake of the subjects was 1,917.2}860.0 IU/day (CV=44.9%, n=284), with 139 subjects (48.9%) meeting the recommended allowance. The retinol level in the blood serum was 42.0}12.4 Κg/dL (n=284), with 5 subjects (1.8%) showing levels below the lower limit of the standard interval of 20|72 (41.8}11.1) Κg/dL. The vitamin E intake was 7.27}2.22 mg/day (CV=30.5%, n=299), with 158 subjects (52.8%) meeting the safe and adequate daily dietary intake set in the Fifth-Revised RDA. Ώ-tocopherol level in the blood serum was 1.27}0.43 mg/dL (n=299), with 9 subjects (3.0%) showing levels below the lower limit of the standard interval of 0.58|2.25 (1.24}0.35) mg/dL. It can be inferred from these results that approximately 10%|30% of current female college students do not meet the recommended allowances of vitamins set in the Fifth-Revised RDA with the exception of niacin, and as for vitamin A and folate, more than 50% failed to meet the allowances. However, only 0.6|3.2% of the subjects were shown to have marginal vitamin deficiency, which was represented by blood vitamin levels below the lower limit of the standard intervals (normal values), with the exception of folate. Therefore, it was suggested that increased intake of folate was necessary. |
|
Coronary Heart Disease
|
| Degenerative disease of the eye
Two serious degenerative diseases of the eye - cataracts and macular degeneration - are common among older adults. Good nutrition, including ample intakes of vitamins and antioxidants, may help to prevent or delay the onset of these disorders. Cataract is a disorder in which the lens of the eye becomes increasingly opaque, leading to impaired vision. Epidemiological studies have shown that the risk of developing cataracts may be lower among multivitamin supplement users, vitamin C or vitamin E supplement users, and people with high dietary intakes of vitamin C than among the general population. These epidemiological findings make biological sense, since oxidative processes are involved in the causation of cataracts, and antioxidants such as vitamins C and E inhibit oxidation. Macular degeneration is a progressive disorder affecting the retina of the eye. Unlike cataract, macular degeneration cannot be treated effectively, so the need for preventive measures is especially urgent. As with cataracts, oxidative processes are involved in the causation of macular degeneration, so antioxidants may be important in preventing this condition. A large study conducted in five areas of the U.S. has shown that people with high dietary intakes or blood levels of antioxidants - especially carotenoids - are less likely to develop macular degeneration than those with lower intakes of these nutrients. This relationship is strongest for lutein and zeaxanthin - two carotenoids found in leafy green vegetables. These carotenoids are also present in the retina of the eye, where they may act as protective antioxidants. Beta-carotene also appears to be protective against macular degeneration. |
| Fatty acid metabolism in the atopic mother
from PUFA Newsletter Vol.3, No.1 There is evidence that breast-feeding helps protect children against
developing atopic conditions such as asthma, and eczema, which are some-times
hereditary in nature. However, the extent of that protection has remained
a matter for debate. Now two new studies, both by the same group of investigators,
may help to resolve this controversy.
Differences between atopic and non-atopic women
|
| Differences to the development of atopy
in the babies during their first year This study followed 58 new mothers, of whom half were atopic and half non-atopic, until their babies were one year old. Twenty-four of the babies developed atopy. Non-atopic mothers of atopic babies were found to have higher levels of the omega-6 fatty acids gamma-linolenic acid [GLA] and DGLA when compared with the other mothers. GLA tended to increase during lactation in mothers of non-atopic babies but remained constant in those of atopic babies. There was also a trend for a more marked decrease in total omega-3 LC-PUFA acid levels [p<0.07] with time in the milk consumed by the babies who developed atopy. An increase in LNA levels in mature milk compared with colostrum was seen only in non-atopic mothers with non-atopic babies; in all other mothers, LNA levels declined, especially in atopic women with atopic babies. In addition, the levels of omega-3 LC-PUFA were lower and the ratios of omega-6/omega-3 LC-PUFA higher in the mature milk of mothers whose babies developed atopy. AA and EPA are precursors of, respectively, more and less inflammatory eicosanoids mediators and compete with each other. The authors suggest that the lower ratios of AA/EPA in non-atopic women could mean that their breast milk would contain greater anti-inflammatory products than that of the atopic women. A similar argument might hold for the low AA/DGLA ratio, they speculate, although the metabolites of DGLA are as yet unknown. The LC-PUFA content of breast milk also affects that of the baby's serum and cell membranes, another mechanism by which it could influence the development of atopy in early childhood. Some work has suggested that supplementation with LC-PUFA might be of benefit in atopic disease. It has been unclear, however, why babies fed breast-milk which has a higher LC-PUFA content than infant formula, are not consistently protected. The present findings provide a possible explanation. |
![]() |
|
from British Journal of Dermatology 1998, 139 In this randomized double-blind human study the short-term photoprotective
effects of different antioxidants and their combinations were evaluated
in vivo.
|
![]() |
|
From VNIS BACK-GROUNDER Vol.6, No.1 Complementary Roles of Nutrition and Physical Activity Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Effects on Immune Function
Maintaining Bone Health
|
![]() |